|
|
The
agency itself is the most profitable source of information about the agency. A close
working relationship with agency staff based on mutual respect will be the most valuable tool
that a lawyer will have. Most agency advice and information will be of an informal oral nature
or be in the form of documents which are readily shared but which may or may not be formally
indexed or published. In some situations, more formal forms of information may be required.
This section discusses some of these.
|
|
Statutes
may permit individuals to seek advice about agency concerns by submitting a question
to the office of the appropriate attorney general.
|
|
An
APA may provide for a procedure to use to request a formal answer to a specific, written
question from the agency. The agency usually has discretion not to respond to such an inquiry.
Where a response is given, the APA usually will provide that the agency is bound by its
response on that particular factual situation.
|
|
Statutes
may permit individuals to seek a formal declaratory order from a court about the
agency.
|
|
Statutes
and agency legislative rules often do not give detailed, specific information. A party
may request information from the agency about a specific matter. The most common form of
inquiry will be to approach an employee of the agency on an informal basis and specify the
request. The issue arises as to whether the informal advice received is binding on the
government. The general answer is that the informal advice is not necessarily binding. These
doctrines are equitable in nature and courts will have to decide each of these cases on its
particular facts.
|
|
Agencies
may provide interpretative rules, as compared to legislative rules. Interpretative rules
are not usually the product of a specific APA procedure. They may appear in the form of
memos, handbooks, or even in speeches. They are often a significant source of information
about how the agency will exercise its delegation of authority. Since interpretative rules do
not
require notice and comment procedures, the agency can change them at any time. In that
sense, they do not "bind" the agency. Courts may substitute their judgment for that
of the
agency when an interpretative rule is challenged, although courts will frequently defer to the
agency's expertise in the interpretation.
|
|
|
|