| 
 Monitoring Stem Cell ResearchThe President's Council on Bioethics
 Washington, D.C.
 January 2004
 www.bioethics.gov
 
 
 Pre-Publication Version
 Appendix L
  Stem Cells and Tissue Regeneration: 
              Lessons From Recipients of Solid Organ Transplantation
                Silviu Itescu M.D. Director of Transplantation Immunology,
 Departments of Medicine and Surgery,
 Columbia University, New York, NY
    CONTENTS    1. OVERVIEW   2. IMMUNOBIOLOGY OF ORGANTRANSPLANTATION   
               The Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA) T Cell Recognition Of Antigen Presented By HLA Molecules
 Thymic Education Of T Cells
 T Cell Recognition Of Alloantigens
 Tolerance Induction
  3. IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE AGENTS COMMONLY USED IN ORGAN TRANSPLANT 
              RECIPIENTS: BENEFITS AND ADVERSE OUTCOMES   4. STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION AND IMMUNOSUPPRESSION  
               Materno-Fetal Tolerance Immunogenic Characteristics Of Embryonic And Adult Stem 
                Cells
 Tolerogenic Effects Of Stem Cell Transplantation
  1. OVERVIEW  The Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) is located on 
              the short arm of chromosome 6 in humans and encodes the alloantigens 
              known as Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA), polymorphic cell 
              surface molecules which enable the immune system to recognize 
              both self and foreign antigens. The class II HLA molecules 
              (HLA-DR, HLA-DP, and HLA-DQ) are usually found only on antigen-presenting 
              cells such as B lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells 
              of lymphoid organs, and initiate the immune response to foreign 
              proteins, including viruses, bacteria, and foreign HLA antigens 
              on transplanted organs.   Following binding of foreign proteins, class II HLA on antigen-presenting 
              cells activate CD4+ T cells, which in turn activate cytotoxic 
              CD8+ T cells to recognize the same foreign antigen bound to 
              HLA class I (HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C, molecules found on the 
              surface of all cells) and destroy the target. The actual recognition 
              of foreign HLA transplantation antigens by T cells is referred 
              to as allorecognition. Two distinct pathways of allorecognition 
              have been described, direct and indirect. The direct pathway 
              involves receptors on the host T cells that directly recognize 
              intact HLA antigens on the cells of the transplanted organ. 
              The indirect pathway requires an antigen-presenting cell that 
              internalizes the foreign antigen and presents it via its own 
              HLA class II molecule on the surface of an antigen-presenting 
              cell to the CD4+ helper T cells.   Once recognition has taken place, an important cascade of 
              events is initiated at the cellular level, culminating in 
              intracellular release of ionized calcium from intracellular 
              stores. The calcium binds with a regulatory protein called 
              calmodulin, forming a complex that activates various phosphatases, 
              particularly calcineurin. Calcineurin dephosphorylates an 
              important cytoplasmic protein called nuclear factor of activated 
              T cells (NFAT), resulting in its migration to the nucleus 
              and induction of the production of various cytokines such 
              as IL-2. These cytokines recruit other T cells to destroy 
              the transplanted organ, ultimately resulting in rejection 
              and loss of the graft.   Immunosuppressive regimens used to prevent allograft rejection 
              are aimed at inhibiting the various arms of the immune response, 
              typically require multiagent combinations, and need to be 
              maintained for the duration of life. The currently used armamentarium 
              confers significant side-effect risks, including infectious 
              and neoplastic complications. Moreover, despite success at 
              preventing early allograft rejection, long-term survival of 
              transplanted organs remains difficult to achieve and novel 
              methods to achieve long-term tolerance are being actively 
              sought.   Stem cells obtained from embryonic or adult sources differ 
              from other somatic cells in that they express very low levels 
              of HLA molecules on their cell surfaces. This endows these 
              cell types with the theoretical potential to escape the standard 
              mechanisms of immune rejection discussed above. However, under 
              conditions that enable cellular differentiation in vitro and 
              in vivo each of these stem cell populations acquires high 
              level expression of HLA molecules, suggesting that their long-term 
              survival following transplantation in vivo may be limited 
              by typical immune rejection phenomena. Recent experimental 
              data, however, provide striking counterintuitive examples 
              that stem cells from both embryonic and adult sources may 
              evade the recipient's immune system and result in long-term 
              engraftment in the absence of immunosuppression despite acquisition 
              of surface HLA molecule expression. These observations may 
              have significant impact on the emerging field of regenerative 
              medicine.        2. IMMUNOBIOLOGY OF ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION The Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA)  Differences between individuals which enable immune recognition 
              of non-self from self are principally due to the extreme polymorphism 
              of genes in the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) on 
              chromosome 6 in man which encode the cell surface HLA molecules. 
              These molecules are cell surface glycoproteins whose biologic 
              function is to bind antigenic peptides (epitopes) derived 
              from viruses, bacteria, or cancer cells, and present them 
              to T cells for subsequent immune recognition. Each HLA gene 
              includes a large number of alleles and the peptide binding 
              specificity varies for each different HLA allele. The 1996 
              WHO HLA Nomenclature Committee report lists more than 500 
              different HLA class I and class II alleles.   Crystallographic x-ray studies have demonstrated that the 
              hypervariable regions encoded by polymorphic regions in the 
              alleles correspond to HLA binding pockets which engage specific 
              "anchor" residues of peptide ligands. One HLA molecule will 
              recognize a range of possible peptides, whereas another HLA 
              molecule will recognize a different range of peptides. Consequently, 
              no two individuals will have the same capability of stimulating 
              an immune response, since they do not bind the same range 
              of immunogenic peptides. It is estimated that >99% of all 
              possible peptides derived from foreign antigens are ignored 
              by any given HLA molecule. Since in the absence of HLA polymorphism 
              a large number of immunogenic peptides would not be recognized, 
              the extensive HLA polymorphism in the population reduces the 
              chance that a given virus or bacterium would not be recognized 
              by a sizable proportion of the population, reducing the likelihood 
              of major epidemics or pandemics.     T Cell Recognition Of Antigen Presented By HLA Molecules  Since HLA molecules regulate peptide display to and activation 
              of the immune system, considerable effort has been devoted 
              to understanding the molecular basis of peptide-HLA interactions. 
              These issues are important for defining the biology of T cell 
              antigen recognition and the properties of a protein that make 
              it immunogenic or non-immunogenic. Specific antigen recognition 
              by T cells is dependent on recognition by the T cell receptor 
              of a three-dimensional complex on the surface of antigen-presenting 
              cells (APC) comprised of the HLA molecule and its bound peptide. 
              The peptides are produced by complex antigen processing machineries 
              within the APC (i.e. proteolytic enzymes, peptide transporters 
              and molecular chaperones) which generate a pre-selected peptide 
              pool for association with the HLA molecules. The different 
              types of T cells require different HLA molecules for antigen 
              presentation, so-called "HLA restriction" phenomena. T cell 
              receptors on CD8+ cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) bind peptides presented 
              by HLA class I molecules, whereas CD4+ T helper cells (Th) 
              recognize peptides bound to HLA class II molecules. Of the 
              8-13 amino acid residues of a bound peptide within a class 
              I or II HLA molecule, only three to four amino acid side chains 
              are accessible to the T cell receptor, and a similar number 
              of amino acids are involved in binding to the HLA molecule. 
                Thymic Education Of T Cells  T cells mature in the thymus to appropriately respond to 
              foreign pathogens without inadvertently attacking the host. 
              Under the influence of various thymic resident cells and factors 
              they elaborate, maturing T cells fall into two categories: 
              those that are able to discriminate between self and non-self 
              and can appropriately respond to foreign pathogens without 
              inadvertently attacking the host, and those which are unable 
              to appropriately discriminate between self and non-self. Dendritic 
              cells have been implicated in the deletion, or inhibition, 
              of T cells reactive to self-antigens, particularly in the 
              thymus during T cell development or in peripheral lymphoid 
              organs. The process of self/non-self discrimination by the 
              maturing T cells is dependent on thymic dendritic cell (DC) 
              presentation of self-antigens in the context of self-HLA molecules. 
              When maturing thymic T cells are highly reactive with self-antigen/HLA 
              complexes, they are deleted so that potentially autoreactive 
              T cells will not be released into the periphery. If a particular 
              foreign antigen can be presented in such a way in the thymus 
              as to fool the maturing T cells into believing that the antigen 
              is part of self tissue, then T cells capable of reacting with 
              this antigen will also be eliminated. Indeed, it has been 
              demonstrated that when mouse thymic DC present transgenically 
              introduced foreign antigens to developing T cells, the mature 
              peripheral T cell repertoire of the mouse lacks T cells capable 
              of reacting with the specific foreign antigen, i.e. it is 
              tolerant to the foreign antigen. This has raised the possibility 
              that injection of dendritic cells into an allogeneic recipient 
              might induce tolerance to a subsequent allograft by causing 
              deletion or inhibition of alloreactive T cells.     T Cell Recognition Of Alloantigens  Recognition of foreign, or allogeneic, HLA antigens by the 
              recipient immune system is the major limitation to the survival 
              of solid organ grafts. The central role of HLA molecules in 
              allograft rejection is due to their role as restriction elements 
              for T cell recognition of donor antigens and the extensive 
              polymorphism displayed by the HLA molecules, which elicit 
              host immune responses. Although progress has been made in 
              the short-term survival of transplants, chronic immunologic 
              rejection remains an impediment to long-term survival.   The primary cause of acute rejection of transplanted organs 
              is so-called "direct" recognition of whole allogeneic 
              HLA antigens by receptors on the surface of recipient T cells. 
              The direct recognition pathway involves recognition by recipient 
              T cells of donor HLA class I and class II molecules, resulting 
              in the generation of cytotoxic and helper T lymphocytes which 
              play a pivotal role in the rejection process. In contrast, 
              chronic rejection of transplanted organs results from so-called 
              "indirect recognition" of donor HLA peptides derived 
              from the allogeneic HLA molecules shed by the donor tissue. 
              These foreign HLA molecules are taken up and processed by 
              recipient antigen presenting cells (APC), and peptide fragments 
              of the allogeneic HLA molecules containing polymorphic amino 
              acid residues are bound and presented by recipient's (self) 
              HLA molecules to recipient (self) T cells. Although direct 
              and indirect recognition of alloantigen generally leads to 
              adverse graft outcome, tolerance induction may occur following 
              exposure of the recipient to donor alloantigens prior to transplantation. 
              Since this strategy is based on the nature and dose of the 
              antigen as well as the route of administration, understanding 
              how to control the balance between activation and unresponsiveness 
              mediated by the direct and/or indirect recognition of alloantigen 
              is a an area of active research which could lead to development 
              of new therapies to prolong graft survival.   Indirect allorecognition has been implicated in recurrent 
              rejection episodes in various transplantation models of cardiac, 
              kidney and skin grafts. Determinants on donor HLA molecules 
              can be divided into two main categories: (a) the dominant 
              allodeterminants that are efficiently processed and presented 
              to alloreactive T cells during allograft rejection; and (b) 
              the cryptic allodeterminants that are potentially immunogenic 
              but do not normally induce alloreactive responses, presumably 
              due to incomplete processing and/or presentation. Indirect 
              recognition of allo-HLA peptides is important for the initiation 
              and spreading of the immune response to other epitopes within 
              the allograft. So-called "spreading" of indirect 
              T cell responses to other allo-HLA epitopes expressed by graft 
              tissue is strongly predictive of recurring episodes of rejection. 
              Tolerance induction to the dominant donor determinants represents 
              potential effective strategy for blocking indirect alloresponses 
              and ensuring long-term graft survival in animal models.     Tolerance Induction  Advances in surgical methods and current immunosuppressive 
              therapies have led to significant improvement in short-term 
              graft survival, however long-term survival rates remain poor.  
              For example, whereas both kidney and heart allografts  have 
              one-year graft survival rates of 85 to 95 percent, only about 
              50% of transplanted hearts survive five years and only about 
              50% of kidney grafts survive ten years. Thus, despite being 
              able to achieve short-term success, these relatively poor 
              long-term graft survival rates demonstrate the limitations 
              of the current clinical immunosuppressive regimens to enable 
              long-term immune evasion by the graft. Consequently, a major 
              goal of transplantation immunobiologists is to induce donor-specific 
              tolerance, allowing the long-term survival of human allografts 
              without the need of HLA-compatibility and without the continuous 
              recipient immunosupression leading to the concomitant risks 
              of infection, malignancy, and/or other specific drug side 
              effects. This would theoretically improve long-term graft 
              survival, reduce or eliminate the continuing need for expensive, 
              toxic and non-specific immunosuppressive therapy and enhance 
              the quality of life.   Insight into some of the mechanisms involved in tolerance 
              induction has been gained from pre-clinical and clinical studies 
              in numerous animal models and in patients, particularly those 
              with liver allografts which typically do not induce a prominent 
              immune response leading to rejection. One possible mechanism 
              by which liver transplantation results in allograft tolerance 
              tolerance may be that the donor or "passenger" lymphoid 
              cells in the transplanted liver emigrate and take up residence 
              in the recipient's immune organs, such as the thymus or 
              lymph nodes. Donor lymphocytes at these sites might "re-educate" 
              the recipient immune system so that the donor organ is not 
              recognized as foreign. In an attempt to initiate a similar 
              process in other organ recipients, transfusions of donor blood 
              or bone marrow have been used to enhance solid organ graft 
              survival in animal models and in clinical trials. These studies 
              are currently ongoing in various organ systems.   Molecular understanding of the cellular immune response 
              has led to new strategies to induce a state of permanent tolerance 
              after transplantation. Several approaches have shown promise, 
              including the use of tolerizing doses of class I HLA-molecules 
              in various forms for the induction of specific unresponsiveness 
              to alloantigens, and the use of synthetic peptides corresponding 
              to HLA class II sequences. Other approaches include alteration 
              in the balance of cytokines that direct the immune response 
              away from the TH1 type of inflammatory response and graft 
              rejection to the TH2 type of response that might lead to improved 
              graft survival, and the use of agents to induce "co-stimulatory 
              blockade" of T cell activation. This latter approach 
              is based on the concept that blockade of a "second signal" 
              to the T cell enables the signal provided to the T cell receptor 
              by the HLA-peptide complex to induce antigen specific tolerance. 
              The experimental use of human dendritic cells as tolerogenic 
              agents has been limited due to the low frequency of circulating 
              dendritic cells in peripheral human blood, the limited accessibility 
              to human lymphoid organs, and the terminal state of differentiation 
              of circulating human dendritic cells making their further 
              expansion ex vivo difficult. Dendritic cells are migratory 
              cells of sparse, but widespread, distribution in both lymphoid 
              and non-lymphoid tissues. Although the earliest precursors 
              are ultimately of bone marrow origin, the precise lineage 
              of dendritic cells is controversial and includes both myeloid-derived 
              and lymphoid-derived populations. Recent work has revealed 
              that an expanded population of mature human dendritic cells 
              can be derived from non-proliferating precursors in vitro 
              is by culturing bone-marrow derived cells with a combination 
              of cytokines. This method of enrichment for human dendritic 
              cells from a precursor population can result in the production 
              of dendritic cells that are tolerogenic to foreign antigens. 
              Whether such cells could be useful when co-administered with 
              an allograft transplant remains to be determined. Nevertheless, 
              it is clear that considerable progress has been made in the 
              past few years using approaches to manipulate the immune response 
              to enable routine donor-specific tolerance, and there is reason 
              to be optimistic that with better understanding of molecular 
              and cellular mechanisms this goal could be attained.     3. IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE AGENTS COMMONLY USED IN   ORGAN TRANSPLANT 
              RECIPIENTS: BENEFITS AND ADVERSE OUTCOMES    Cyclosporine  Cyclosporine has been the single most important factor associated 
              with improved outcomes after organ transplantation over the 
              past two decades. CyA binds to a cytosolic cell protein, cyclophilin 
              (CyP). The CyA-CyP complex then binds to calcineurin and subsequently 
              blocks interleukin-2 (IL-2) transcription. The binding of 
              IL-2 to the IL-2 receptors on the surface of T lymphocytes 
              is a key stimulant in promoting lymphocyte proliferation, 
              activation, and ultimately allograft rejection. A review of 
              the first decade of experience with heart transplantation 
              revealed a total of 379 cardiac allograft recipients worldwide; 
              actuarial survival rates in this cohort of patients at 1 year 
              and 5 years were 56% and 31% respectively; the main causes 
              of death being acute rejection and the side effects of immunosuppression. 
              With the introduction and widespread use of CyA over the next 
              decade, survival rates dramatically improved to 85% and 75% 
              at 1 and 5 years respectively.  Similar results were obtained 
              with other organ transplants, including kidney and lung.   The major adverse effects of CyA are nephrotoxicity, hypertension, 
              neurotoxocity and hyperlipidemia; less common side effects 
              include hirsuitism, gingival hyperplasia and liver dysfunction. 
              CyA nephrotoxicity can manifest as either acute or chronic 
              renal dysfunction. It is important to note that a number of 
              drugs commonly used in transplant patients, such as aminoglycosides, 
              amphotericin B and ketoconazole can potentiate the nephrotoxicity 
              induced by CyA. More than half the patients receiving CyA 
              will require treatment for hypertension within the first year 
              following transplantation. Corticosteroids also potentiate 
              the side effects of CyA such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia 
              and hirsuitism.                Frequent monitoring of the 
              serum level is essential to minimize the adverse effects. 
              One of the major limitations of the original oil-based CyA 
              formulation (Sandimmune) is its variable and unpredictable 
              bioavailability. In the mid-90s Neoral was introduced, a new 
              microemulsion formula of CyA, which has greater bioavailability 
              and more predictable pharmacokinetics than Sandimmune.     Tacrolimus  Tacrolimus (FK506) is a macrolide antibiotic that inhibits 
              T-cell activation and proliferation and inhibits production 
              of other cytokines. The product of Streptomyces tsurubaensis 
              fermentation, FK 506 was first discovered in 1984 and first 
              used in clinical studies in 1988 at the University of Pittsburgh. 
              While the mechanism of action of tacrolimus is similar to 
              that of CyA, and comparative clinical trials have suggested 
              similar efficacy, it has been suggested that some groups of 
              patients may benefit from tacrolimus rather than CyA as primary 
              immunosuppressive therapy. Unlike CyA, hirsuitism and gingival 
              hyperplasia occur infrequently with tacrolimus; thus, tacrolimus-based 
              therapy may improve compliance and quality of life in female 
              and pediatric transplant recipients. It should be noted that 
              alopecia has been documented with tacrolimus, but is known 
              to improve with dose reductions. The decreased incidence of 
              hypertension and hyperlipidemia with tacrolimus makes it preferable 
              to CyA in patients with difficult to treat hypertension or 
              hyperlipidemia. A final indication for tacrolimus has been 
              as a rescue immunosuppressant in cardiac transplant recipients 
              on CyA with refractory rejection or intolerance to immunosuppression 
              (severe side effects). Since tacrolimus is metabolized using 
              the same cytochrome P450 enzyme system as CyA, drug interactions 
              are essentially the same. Thus, drugs that induce this system 
              may increase the metabolism of tacrolimus, thereby decreasing 
              its blood levels. Conversely, drugs that inhibit the P450 
              system decrease the metabolism of tacrolimus, thereby increasing 
              its blood levels. It is important to note that some studies 
              have indicated a higher incidence of nephrotoxicity with tacrolimus 
              as compared to CyA.
  Azathioprine and Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)  Despite being available for more than 35 years, azathioprine 
              is still a useful agent as an immunosuppressive agent. Following 
              administration, azathioprine is converted into 6-mercaptopurine, 
              with subsequent transformation to a series of intracellularly 
              active metabolites. These inhibit both an early step in de 
              novo purine synthesis and several steps in the purine 
              salvage pathway. The net effect is depletion of cellular purine 
              stores, thus inhibiting DNA and RNA synthesis, the impact 
              of which is most marked on actively dividing lymphocytes responding 
              to antigenic stimulation. In currently used immunosuppressive 
              protocols, azathioprine is used as part of a triple therapy 
              regimen along with CyA or tacrolimus and prednisone. Mycophenolate 
              mofetil (MMF), which is rapidly hydrolyzed after ingestion 
              to mycophenolic acid, is a selective, noncompetitive, reversible 
              inhibitor of onosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, a key enzyme 
              in the de novo synthesis of guanine nucleotides. Unlike other 
              marrow-derived cells and parenchymal cells that use the hypoxanthine-guanine 
              phosphoribosyl transferase (salvage) pathway, activated lymphocytes 
              rely predominantly on the de novo pathway for purine synthesis. 
              This functional selectivity allows lymphocyte proliferation 
              to be specifically targeted with less anticipated effect on 
              erythropoiesis and neutrophil production than is seen with 
              azathioprine.   Early studies in human kidney and heart transplant recipients 
              showed that MMF, when substituted for azathioprine in standard 
              triple-therapy regimens, is well tolerated and more efficacious 
              than azathioprine. In a large, double-blind, randomized multicenter 
              study comparing MMF versus azathioprine (with CyA and prednisone) 
              involving 650 patients, the MMF group was associated with 
              significant reduction in mortality as well as a reduction 
              in the requirement for rejection treatment. However, there 
              was noted to be an increase in the incidence of opportunistic 
              viral infections in the MMF group. The overall greater efficacy 
              of MMF compared to azathioprine has resulted in MMF generally 
              replacing azathioprine in triple immunosuppressive protocols 
              together with steroids and cyclosporine in most solid organ 
              recipients.     Corticosteroids  Steroids are routinely used in almost all immunosuppressive 
              protocols after organ transplantation. The metabolic side 
              effects of steroids are well known and lead to significant 
              morbidity and mortality in the post-transplant period. Almost 
              90% of organ recipients continue to receive prednisone at 
              1-year post-transplant and 70% at three-years post-transplant. 
              A recent review of over 1800 patients from a combined registry 
              outlined the morbid complications that patients suffer within 
              the first year after transplantation. Many of these complications 
              are known side effects of prednisone, including hypertension 
              (16%), diabetes mellitus (16%), hyperlipidemia (26%), bone 
              disease (5%) and cataracts (2%). It is thereby obvious that 
              avoidance of steroids may decrease morbidity and mortality 
              after organ transplantation. Two general approaches are used 
              to institute prednisone-free immunosuppression: early and 
              late withdrawal.   Withdrawal of prednisone during the first month post-transplant 
              has resulted in long-term success of steroid withdrawal in 
              50-80% of patients. In these studies, the use of antilymphocyte 
              antibody induction therapy appears to increase the likelihood 
              of steroid withdrawal. Several centers have reported their 
              results with immunosuppressive regimens that did not include 
              steroids in the early post-transplant period. Studies reporting 
              high success rates of 80% have used specific enrolment criteria, 
              such as excluding patients with recurrent acute rejections 
              or those with female gender. Review of numerous studies demonstrate 
              that steroid free maintenance immunosuppression is possible 
              in atleast 50% of patients, is as safe as triple drug therapy 
              and may reduce some of the long-term complications of steroids. 
              Owing to the fact that the majority of acute rejection episodes 
              occur in the first three months post-transplant, steroid withdrawal 
              is made after this time period, resulting in long-term success 
              in about 80% of patients. Generally, there is no need for 
              conventional induction agents when late withdrawal of steroids 
              is done.     Anti-Lymphocyte Antibody Therapy  Despite the extensive use of induction therapy using anti-lymphocyte 
              antibody in solid organ transplantation, their exact role 
              is unclear. There is no doubt that routine use of these agents 
              is unwarranted as the generalized immunosuppression induced 
              by then increased the risk of infections and malignancy. Despite 
              the lack of consistent data supporting the routine use of 
              induction therapy with anti-lymphocyte antibody agents, there 
              is a role in certain select situations. Specifically, patients 
              with early post-operative renal or hepatic dysfunction may 
              benefit especially by the avoidance of cyclosporine therapy 
              while using these induction agents. Anti-lymphocyte antibody 
              therapy can provide effective immunosuppression for atleast 
              10 to 14 days without CyA or tacrolimus therapy. It has also 
              been suggested that patients with overwhelming postoperative 
              bacterial infections or diabetics with severe postoperative 
              hyperglycemia may benefit from the comparatively low doses 
              of corticosteroids required during anti-lymphocyte induction 
              therapy.   The two main types of induction agents have been either 
              the polyclonal antilymphocyte or antithymocyte globulins and 
              more recently the murine monoclonal antibody OKT3. While these 
              agents have been shown to be effective in terminating acute 
              allograft rejection and in treating refractory rejection, 
              the results of comparative studies of outcomes with and without 
              monoclonal induction therapy have varied, with most studies 
              demonstrating an effect on rejection that is maintained only 
              while antibody therapy is ongoing. Without repeated administration, 
              these agents only delay the time to a first rejection episode 
              without decreasing the overall frequency or severity of rejection. 
              More importantly, their use has been associated with an increased 
              risk of short-term (infections) and long-term (lympho-proliferative 
              disorders) complications. A complication specific to OKT3 
              is the development of a "flu-like syndrome" characterized 
              by fever, chills and mild hypotension, typically seen with 
              the first dose.   Since antilymphocyte antibodies are produced in nonhuman 
              species, their use is associated with the phenomenon of sensitization, 
              leading to decreased effectiveness with repeated use as well 
              as the possibilty of serum sickness. The development of sensitization 
              has been linked with an increased risk of acute vascular rejection. 
              While this association has not been reported by other centers 
              using OKT3 prophylaxis, it is believed that the development 
              of immune-complex disease, inadequate immunosuppression due 
              to decreased OKT3 levels or that OKT3 sensitization may be 
              a marker for patients at higher risk for humoral rejection 
              may be responsible for this phenomenon.     Interleukin-2 Receptor Inhibition  A new class of drugs has been developed which targets the 
              high affinity IL-2 receptor. This receptor is present on nearly 
              all activated T cells but not on resting T cells. In vivo 
              activation of the high-affinity IL-2 receptor by IL-2 promoted 
              the clonal expansion of the activated T cell population. A 
              variety of rodent monoclonal antibodies directed against the 
              a chain of the receptor have been used in animals and humans 
              to achieve selective immunosuppression by targeting only T-cell 
              clones responding to the allograft. Chimerisation or humanisation 
              of these monoclonal antibodies resulted in antibodies with 
              a predominantly human framework that retained the antigen 
              specificity of the original rodent monoclonal antibodies. 
              A fully humanized anti-IL2R monoclonal antibody, daclizumab, 
              and a chimeric anti-IL-2R monoclonal antibody, basiliximab, 
              have undergone successful phase III trials demonstrating their 
              efficacy in the immunoprophylaxis of patients undergoing renal 
              and cardiac transplantation.   Both agents have immunomodulatory effects that are similar 
              to those of other monoclonal antibody-based therapies (i.e., 
              induction of clonal anergy rather than clonal deletion). The 
              advantages of these agents include their lack of immunogenicity, 
              long half-lives, ability to repeat dosing, and short-term 
              safety profile. Daclizumab appears to be an effective adjuvant 
              immunomodulating agent in cardiac allograft recipients. It 
              has advantages over conventional induction therapy as it is 
              more selective and can be used for prolonged and potentially 
              repeated periods. Studies with larger cohorts are needed to 
              further study the short-term and long-term survival benefits 
              for patients following organ transplantation and should determine 
              the optimal dosing schedules of these new agents.
  4. STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION AND IMMUNO-SUPPRESSION    Materno-Fetal Tolerance  As outlined above, when tissues from an HLA-disparate donor 
              are transplanted into a recipient they are always recognized 
              as foreign, and immunosuppression is required to prevent rejection. 
              An important exception to this is observed in pregnant women 
              who tolerate their unborn fetus despite the fact that it expresses 
              a full set of non-maternal HLA antigens inherited from the 
              father. The mechanisms by which embryonic tissue demonstrates 
              immune privilege during prenatal development have not yet 
              been fully elucidated, however it is evident that interactions 
              between fetus and mother differ substantially from the events 
              triggered by a classical allograft. Consequently, much work 
              is being dedicated to the emerging field of materno-fetal 
              immunobiology in order to enable the development of innovative 
              strategies to induce tolerance and prevent allogeneic graft 
              rejection.   When maternal T cells encounter the fetus they demonstrate 
              adaptive tolerance. In part this may be due to the absence 
              of expression of MHC class II antigens and low levels of expression 
              of MHC class I antigens on fetal cells. However, this can 
              only partly explain the state of prolonged maternal tolerance 
              since induction of HLA class I and II molecules inevitably 
              occurs as the fetus matures and differentiates, yet rejection 
              still does not occur. Consequently, non-fetal aspects of the 
              placental barrier must be of critical importance in maintaining 
              prolonged tolerance to the fetus. An important mechanism may 
              relate to upregulation of the human non-classical HLA class 
              Ib antigen, designated HLA-G, by the syncytiotrophoblast. 
              HLA-G molecules bind to inhibitory receptors on natural killer 
              cells and subsequently protect against maternal rejection 
              responses. The placenta produces high levels of the anti-inflammatory 
              cytokine interleukin 10 which stimulates HLA-G synthesis while 
              concomitantly downregulating MHC class I antigen production, 
              thus contributing to the tolerance-inducing local environment. 
              The trophoblast also produces high levels of the enzyme indoleamine 
              2,3-dioxygenase, which catabolizes tryptophan, an essential 
              amino acid necessary for rapid T cell proliferation. Annexin 
              II, found in isolated placental membranes in vitro is present 
              in placental serum, exerts immunosuppressive properties, and 
              additionally contributes to fetal allograft survival. Together, 
              these features indicate that materno-fetal tolerance results 
              from a combination of transiently reduced antigenicity of 
              the fetus in combination with a complex tolerance-inducing 
              milieu at the placental barrier.     Immunogenic Characteristics Of Embryonic And Adult 
              Stem Cells  Murine and human embryonic stem (ES) cells do not express 
              HLA class I and II antigens, and demonstrate reduced surface 
              expression of co-stimulatory molecules important for T cell 
              activation. Transplantation of murine ES cells demonstrates 
              long-term graft survival despite the fact that these cells 
              do acquire HLA class II antigen expression after in vivo differentiation. 
              Since they are able to accomplish long-term engraftment without 
              the need for immunosuppression, their inability to induce 
              an immune response is not likely to be the result of escaping 
              immune surveillance, but rather due to their ability to colonize 
              the recipient thymus and induce intrathymic deletion of alloreactive 
              recipient T cells.   Recently, a population of cells has been described in human 
              adult bone marrow that has similar functional characteristics 
              to embryonic stem cells in that they have high self-regenerating 
              capability and capacity for differentiation into multiple 
              cell types, including muscle, cartilage, fat, bone, and heart 
              tissue. While such cells, termed adult mesenchymal stem cells 
              (MSC), appear to have a more restricted self-renewal capacity 
              and differentiation potential than ES cells, their functional 
              characteristics may be sufficient for clinically meaningful 
              tissue regeneration. A striking recent observation is that 
              MSC can broadly inhibit T-cell proliferation and activation 
              by various types of antigenic stimulation, including allogeneic 
              stimuli. MSCs have been shown to inhibit both naive and memory 
              T cell responses in a dose-dependent fashion and affect cell 
              proliferation, cytotoxicity, and the number of interferon 
              gamma (IFN-gamma)-producing T cells. MSCs appear to inhibit 
              T cell activation through direct contact, and do not require 
              other regulatory cellular populations. Similarly to ES cells, 
              adult bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) do 
              not express HLA class II molecules, and only low levels of 
              HLA class I molecules. Despite the fact that MSC can be induced 
              to express surface HLA class II molecules by in vitro culture 
              with cytokines such as interferon-gamma, their ability to 
              inhibit T cell activation results in induction of T cell non-responsiveness 
              to the MSC themselves, endowing them with potential survival 
              advantages in the setting of transplantation.     Tolerogenic Effects Of Stem Cell Transplantation  Extending the approaches discussed above using donor-derived 
              blood transfusions to induce a tolerogenic state to the subsequent 
              organ, the most promising clinical strategy for tolerance 
              induction at present is the use of donor-derived hematopoietic 
              stem cells in conjunction with reduced myeloablative conditioning. 
              The objective of this therapy is to achieve a state of so-called 
              mixed chimerism, or the permanent co-existence of donor- and 
              recipient-derived blood cells comprising all the different 
              hematopoietic lineages in the same host. This approach has 
              been tested in a variety of small and large animal settings 
              and currently available data suggest that stable engraftment 
              of donor bone marrow reliably renders the host tolerant to 
              donor antigens and subsequently to any cellular or solid organ 
              graft of the same donor.   The two underlying mechanisms by which creation of a mixed-chimeric 
              host results in tolerance induction are (1) thymic deletion 
              of potentially donor-specific alloreactive T cells, and (2) 
              nonthymic peripheral mechanisms, such as blocking costimulatory 
              T cell activation, which facilitate the process of donor bone-marrow 
              or stem cell engraftment. However, despite the efficacy of 
              an approach using fully HLA-mismatched stem cells in an allogeneic 
              host to induce tolerance to a subsequent organ allograft, 
              the host is placed at a high risk of substantial morbidity 
              and mortality due to toxicity of the myeloablative conditioning 
              regimen and potential for graft-versus-host disease, or immune-mediated 
              attack of the host by the implanted allogeneic stem cells. 
              In an attempt to overcome these potential limiting toxicities, 
              investigators have suggested the use of either adult bone 
              marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells or preimplantation-derived 
              embryonic stem (ES) cells for induction of mixed chimerism. 
              The theoretical advantages of these cell types is their low 
              level of surface expression of HLA class I and II antigens, 
              and reduced surface expression of co-stimulatory molecules 
              important for T cell activation. Rat preimplantation stage 
              derived embryonic-like stem cells have been shown to successfully 
              engraft in the recipient bone marrow without the need for 
              pre-conditioning therapies such as irradiation, cytotoxic 
              drug regimens or T cell depletion. Long-term partial mixed 
              chimerism by use of rat preimplantation stage derived embryonic-like 
              stem cells did not trigger graft-versus-host reactions, in 
              contrast to the high frequency of this complication in the 
              clinical setting of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. 
              Of most interest, the induced partial chimerism enabled the 
              recipient animals to be tolerant to a subsequent heart allograft. 
              Allograft acceptance required the presence of an intact thymus, 
              and rat ES cells were present in the recipient thymus.   Similar results have been reported following transplantation 
              of human adult bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells 
              (MSC) into fetal sheep early in gestation, before and after 
              the expected development of immunologic competence. In this 
              xenogeneic system, human MSC engrafted, differentiated in 
              a site-specific manner, and persisted in multiple tissues 
              for as long as 13 months after transplantation, including 
              the thymus. Since MSCs do not present alloantigen and do not 
              require MHC expression to exert their inhibitory effect on 
              alloimmune reactivity, the possibility exists that they could 
              theoretically be derived from a donor irrespective of their 
              HLA type and used to inhibit T-cell responses to transplantation 
              antigens of an unrelated third party. In initial human clinical 
              studies, the use human adult bone marrow-derived mesenchymal 
              stem cells has been shown to successfully enable engraftment 
              of subsequently infused allogeneic bone marrow in transplant 
              recipients, reduce the risk of graft-versus-host disease, 
              and reduce the need for concomitantly administered immunosuppression. 
              Whether similar results will be obtained when combining adult 
              bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells with solid organ 
              allografts remains to be determined, and this is an area of 
              active research for clinical transplant immunobiologists. 
              Of broader relevance, if the results relating to long-term 
              engraftment and survival of adult bone marrow-derived MSC 
              are confirmed and extended in human clinical studies, they 
              will have broad implications for the field of tissue and organ 
              regeneration.  _________________  Selected References Billingham RE, Brent L, Medawar PB (1953) 
              Actively acquired tolerance of foreign cells. Nature 172:603-606.  Auchincloss H Jr (2001) In search of the 
              elusive holy grail: the mechanisms and prospects for achieving 
              clinical transplantation tolerance. Am J Transplant 1:6-12.  Wekerle T, Kurtz J, Ito H, Ronquillo JV, 
              Dong V, Zhao G, Shaffer J, Sayegh MH, Sykes M (2000) Allogeneic 
              bone marrow transplantation with co-stimulatory blockade induces 
              macrochimerism and tolerance without cytoreductive host treatment. 
              Nat Med 6:464-469.  Watkins DI (1995) The evolution of major 
              histocompatibility class I genes in primates. Crit Rev Immunol 
              15:1-29.  Salter-Cid L, Flajnik MF (1995) Evolution 
              and developmental regulation of the major histocompatibility 
              complex. Crit Rev Immunol 15:31-75.  Fowlkes BJ, Ramsdell F (1993) T-cell tolerance. 
              Curr Opin Immunol 5:873-879.  Marrack P, Kappler J (1990) T cell tolerance. 
              Semin Immunol 2:45-49.  Van Parijs L, Abbas AK (1998) Homeostasis 
              and self-tolerance in the immune system: turning lymphocytes 
              off. Science 280:243-249.  Davies JD, Martin G, Phillips J, Marshall 
              SE, Cobbold SP, Waldmann H (1996) T cell regulation in adult 
              transplantation tolerance. J Immunol 157:529-533.  Thomson AW, Lu L (1999) Dendritic cells are 
              regulators of immune reactivity: implications for transplantation. 
              Transplantation 68:1-8.  Brent L (1997) Fetally and neonatally induced 
              immunologic tolerance. In: Brent L (ed) A history of transplantation 
              immunology. Academic, San Diego.  Matzinger P (1994) Tolerance, danger, and 
              the extended family. Annu Rev Immunol 12:991-1045.  Janeway CAJ (1992) The immune system evolved 
              to discriminate infectious nonself from noninfectious self. 
              Immunol Today 13:11-16.  Mellor AL, Munn DH (2001) Extinguishing maternal 
              immune responses during pregnancy: implications for immunosuppression. 
              Semin Immunol 13:213-218.  Fändrich F, Lin X, Chai GX, Schulze M, Ganten 
              D, Bader M, Holle J, Huang DS, Parwaresch R, Zavazava N, Binas 
              B (2002) Preimplantation-stage stem cells induce allogeneic 
              graft tolerance without supplementary host conditioning. Nat 
              Med 8:171-178.  Liechty KW, et al (2000). Human mesenchymal 
              stem cells engraft and demonstrate site-specific differentiation 
              after in utero transplantation in sheep. Nat Med 6(11):1282-6. 
                Krampera M, et al (2002). Bone marrow mesenchymal 
              stem cells inhibit the response of naive and memory antigen-specific 
              T cells to their cognate peptide. Blood, 101(9):3722-3729. 
                Le Blanc K, Tammik L, Sundberg B, Haynesworth 
              SE, Ringden O (2003). Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit and stimulate 
              mixed lymphocyte cultures and mitogenic responses independently 
              of the major histocompatibility complex.Scand J Immunol. 57(1):11-20. 
                  |