Standards for Access without Autorization
HIPAA allows IRBs, or a special privacy board, which is like an IRB which only deals with HIPAA, to modify the authorization requirements, consistent with the other protections on human subjects researches. Decisions to waive or modify the authorization must meet these standards:
Documentation of the waiver or alteration of Authorization must include a statement identifying the IRB or Privacy Board that made the approval and the date of approval. Among other things, the documentation must also include statements that the IRB or Privacy Board has determined that the waiver or alteration of Authorization, in whole or in part, satisfies the following criteria:
  • The use or disclosure of the PHI involves no more than minimal risk to the privacy of individuals based on, at least, the presence of the following elements:
    • An adequate plan to protect health information identifiers from improper use and disclosure.
    • An adequate plan to destroy identifiers at the earliest opportunity consistent with conduct of the research (absent a health or research justification for retaining them or a legal requirement to do so).
    • Adequate written assurances that the PHI will not be reused or disclosed to (shared with) any other person or entity, except as required by law, for authorized oversight of the research study, or for other research for which the use or disclosure of the PHI would be permitted under the Privacy Rule.
  • The research could not practicably be conducted without the waiver or alteration.
  • The research could not practicably be conducted without access to and use of the PHI.
The Privacy Rule does not require an IRB or Privacy Board to review the form or content of the Authorization a researcher or covered entity intends to use, or the proposed uses and disclosures of PHI made according to an Authorization. Under the Privacy Rule, an IRB or Privacy Board need only review requests to waive or alter the Authorization requirement.[ HIPAA Research at 17.]