Ankney RN, Coil JA. Residents’ knowledge of the National Practitioner Data
Bank. Acad Med. 1994;69:243.
Ankney RN, Coil JA, Kolff J, Esper E. NPDB: what physicians don’t know can hurt
them. Pa Med. 1994;97:10–14.
Ankney RN, Coil JA, Kolff J, Esper E. Physician understanding of the National
Practitioner Data Bank. South Med J. 1995;88:200–203.
Bok S. Impaired physicians: what should patients know?
Camb Q Healthc
Brouillette JN. Bilateral deselection. J Fla Med Assoc. 1995;82:423.
Cohen RJ. Managed care and the physician–patient relationship: implications for
peer review. Md Med J. 1997;46:91– 93.
Corsino BV, Morrow DH, Wallace CJ. Quality improvement and substance
abuse: rethinking impaired provider policies.
Am J Med Qual. 1996;11:94–99.
Couch JB, Kauffman A, Merry M. The value of external peer review after the
Health Care Quality Improvement Act and Patrick v. Burget.
Qual Assur Util
Crespo RA. Physician deselection: what it means for you.
Wis Med J. 1997;96:58–62.
Faunce TA, Rudge B. Deaths on the table: proposal for an international
convention on the investigation and prevention of anaesthetic mortality.
Med Law. 1998;17:31–54.
Freeman J. Peer review is critical to quality medical care.
Iowa Med. 1997;87:357.
Gilbert ML. The National Practitioner Data Bank: is big brother watching you?
Colo Dent Assoc. 1998;77:30–31.
Graddy B. Self-query and the National Practitioner Data Bank: issues of
confidentiality. Tex Med. 1993;89:54–55.
Graddy B. TMA takes aim against deselection.
Tex Med. 1994;90:14–17.
Granville RL, Flannery FT. The National Practitioner Data Bank: an overview for
the emergency physician. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1993;11:923–931.
Hay CR. Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: what physicians need to
know about the Act. Kans Med. 1989;90:239–240, 242, 244.
Heffernan M. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 and the
National Practitioner Data Bank: the controversy over practitioner privacy
versus public access. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1996;84:263–269.
Heim SW, Stevermer JJ. Do peer review organizations improve quality of care in
AMI? J Fam Pract. 1998;47:95.
Horner SL. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: its history,
provisions, applications and implications. Am J Law Med. 1990;16:455–498.
Hotko B, Van Dyke D. Peer review: strengthening leadership skills.
Nurs Manage. 1998;29:41, 44.
Kennedy KE. Peer review: federal and state protection.
Minn Med. 1996;79:52–54.
King JY. Practice guidelines and medical malpractice litigation.
Med Law. 1997;16:29–39.
Levine RD, Sugarman M, Schiller W, Weinshel S, Lehning EJ, Lagasse RS. The
effect of group discussion on interrater reliability of structured peer review.
Liner RS. Physician deselection: the dynamics of a new threat to the physician–
patient relationship. Am J Law Med. 1997;23:511–537.
Lingle EA, Frazier DS. Physician defamation: candor rarely results in liability.
J Leg Med. 1997;18:521–538.
Maguire D. Ten commandments of peer review.
Neonatal Netw. 1998;17:63–67.
Martz EW. Confidentiality and control. Del Med J. 1997;69:157–159.
Martz EW. National Practitioner Data Bank.
Del Med J. 1995;67:492–493.
Meadow W, Bell A, Lantos J. Physicians’ experience with allegations of medical
malpractice in the neonatal intensive care unit.
Metter EJ, Granville RL, Kussman MJ. The effect of threshold amounts for
reporting malpractice payments to the National Practitioner Data Bank:
analysis using the closed claims data base of the Office of the Assistant
Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs).
Mil Med. 1997;162:257–261.
Montague J. Breaking the bank? MDs say NPDB needs screening.
Hosp Health Netw. 1993;67:51.
Montague J. Should the public have access to the National Practitioner Data
Bank? Hosp Health Netw. 1994;68:52, 54–56.
Neighbor WE, Baldwin LM, West PA, Hart LG. Rural hospitals’ experience with
the National Practitioner Data Bank.
Am J Public Health. 1997;87:663–666.
Ortolon K. Deselection, round two: TMA takes due process fight with managed
care organizations to US Congress. Tex Med. 1994;90:20–22.
Oshel RE, Croft T, Rodak J Jr. The National Practitioner Data Bank: the first 4
years. Public Health Rep. 1995;110:383– 394.
Pallesen KS. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: National
Practitioner Data Bank. Nebr Med J. 1991;76:353–372.
Pugsley SC. Implementing the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
Leg Med. 1990:217–242.
Rifkin AM, Evans GE, Hall GD. Antitrust’s recent attack on the peer review
practitioner: is the Health Care Quality Improvement Act a viable remedy?
Med J. 1990;39:21– 32.
Ronai SE. Physician deselection by managed care plans: due process guidance
for doctors terminated without cause.
Conn Med. 1997;61:483–486.
Ronai SE, Meng ME. Civil liability of peer review participants: Patrick v. Burget
and the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986.
Conn Med. 1988;52:537–540.
Sandrick K. Two years and running: the National Practitioner Data Bank begins
to roll, but issues remain. Hospitals. 1993;67:44–45.
Scott C. Should physicians have a voice in insurer settlements of medical
malpractice claims? J Fla Med Assoc. 1993;80:633–666.
Segall SE, Pearl W. Should due process be part of hospital peer review?
South Med J. 1993;86:368–369.
Setness PA. What do you know about the NPDB?
Sfikas PM. Peer review and antitrust.
J Am Dent Assoc. 1997;128:496–498.
Sheets V. Why disciplinary databanks? Why the National Practitioner Data Bank
(NPDB)? Issues. 1996;17:10–11.
Smart CM III. The peer review privilege: what documents are protected from
discovery in litigation. Mo Med. 1998;95:205–206.
Smith MA, Atherly AJ, Kane RL, Pacala JT. Peer review of the quality of care:
reliability and sources of variability for outcome and process assessments.
JAMA. 1997;278: 1573–1578.
Snelson E. Quality assurance implications of federal peer review laws: the
Health Care Quality Improvement Act and the National Practitioner Data Bank.
Qual Assur Util Rev. 1992;7:2–11.
Snelson EA. Peer review, hearing requirements, and antitrust: maximizing
federal Health Care Quality Improvement Act compliance and immunity.
Assoc Ga. 1992;81:495– 497.
Snelson EA. Physicians under surveillance: the National Practitioner Data Bank.
Minn Med. 1993;76:31–33.
Stern DF. Handling clinical incidents. Nurs Manage. 1997;28:48B–48C, 48G–48H.
Todd JS. National Practitioner Data Bank: just numbers or knowledge?
Health Rep. 1995;110:377–378.
Wolfe SM. Congress should open the National Practitioner Data Bank to all.
Public Health Rep. 1995;110:378–379.
Wolfe SM. Questionable doctors—lots of them!
Revolution. 1996;6:20–22, 85.
Wyden R. Transparency: a prescription against malpractice.
Public Health Rep.
Yessian MR. Putting the controversy aside, how is the Data Bank doing?
Health Rep. 1995;110:381–382.