Ankney RN, Coil JA. Residents’ knowledge of the National Practitioner Data
Bank. Acad Med. 1994;69:243.
Ankney RN, Coil JA, Kolff J, Esper E. NPDB: what physicians don’t know can hurt
them. Pa Med. 1994;97:10–14.
Ankney RN, Coil JA, Kolff J, Esper E. Physician understanding of the National
Practitioner Data Bank. South Med J. 1995;88:200–203.
Bok S. Impaired physicians: what should patients know?
Camb Q Healthc
Ethics. 1993;2:331–340.
Brouillette JN. Bilateral deselection. J Fla Med Assoc. 1995;82:423.
Cohen RJ. Managed care and the physician–patient relationship: implications for
peer review. Md Med J. 1997;46:91– 93.
Corsino BV, Morrow DH, Wallace CJ. Quality improvement and substance
abuse: rethinking impaired provider policies.
Am J Med Qual. 1996;11:94–99.
Couch JB, Kauffman A, Merry M. The value of external peer review after the
Health Care Quality Improvement Act and Patrick v. Burget.
Qual Assur Util
Rev. 1989;4:86–88.
Crespo RA. Physician deselection: what it means for you.
Wis Med J. 1997;96:58–62.
Faunce TA, Rudge B. Deaths on the table: proposal for an international
convention on the investigation and prevention of anaesthetic mortality.
Med Law. 1998;17:31–54.
Freeman J. Peer review is critical to quality medical care.
Iowa Med. 1997;87:357.
Gilbert ML. The National Practitioner Data Bank: is big brother watching you?
J
Colo Dent Assoc. 1998;77:30–31.
Graddy B. Self-query and the National Practitioner Data Bank: issues of
confidentiality. Tex Med. 1993;89:54–55.
Graddy B. TMA takes aim against deselection.
Tex Med. 1994;90:14–17.
Granville RL, Flannery FT. The National Practitioner Data Bank: an overview for
the emergency physician. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1993;11:923–931.
Hay CR. Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: what physicians need to
know about the Act. Kans Med. 1989;90:239–240, 242, 244.
Heffernan M. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 and the
National Practitioner Data Bank: the controversy over practitioner privacy
versus public access. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1996;84:263–269.
Heim SW, Stevermer JJ. Do peer review organizations improve quality of care in
AMI? J Fam Pract. 1998;47:95.
Horner SL. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: its history,
provisions, applications and implications. Am J Law Med. 1990;16:455–498.
Hotko B, Van Dyke D. Peer review: strengthening leadership skills.
Nurs Manage. 1998;29:41, 44.
Kennedy KE. Peer review: federal and state protection.
Minn Med. 1996;79:52–54.
King JY. Practice guidelines and medical malpractice litigation.
Med Law. 1997;16:29–39.
Levine RD, Sugarman M, Schiller W, Weinshel S, Lehning EJ, Lagasse RS. The
effect of group discussion on interrater reliability of structured peer review.
Anesthesiology. 1998;89:507–515.
Liner RS. Physician deselection: the dynamics of a new threat to the physician–
patient relationship. Am J Law Med. 1997;23:511–537.
Lingle EA, Frazier DS. Physician defamation: candor rarely results in liability.
J Leg Med. 1997;18:521–538.
Maguire D. Ten commandments of peer review.
Neonatal Netw. 1998;17:63–67.
Martz EW. Confidentiality and control. Del Med J. 1997;69:157–159.
Martz EW. National Practitioner Data Bank.
Del Med J. 1995;67:492–493.
Meadow W, Bell A, Lantos J. Physicians’ experience with allegations of medical
malpractice in the neonatal intensive care unit.
Pediatrics. 1997;99:E10.
Metter EJ, Granville RL, Kussman MJ. The effect of threshold amounts for
reporting malpractice payments to the National Practitioner Data Bank:
analysis using the closed claims data base of the Office of the Assistant
Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs).
Mil Med. 1997;162:257–261.
Montague J. Breaking the bank? MDs say NPDB needs screening.
Hosp Health Netw. 1993;67:51.
Montague J. Should the public have access to the National Practitioner Data
Bank? Hosp Health Netw. 1994;68:52, 54–56.
Neighbor WE, Baldwin LM, West PA, Hart LG. Rural hospitals’ experience with
the National Practitioner Data Bank.
Am J Public Health. 1997;87:663–666.
Ortolon K. Deselection, round two: TMA takes due process fight with managed
care organizations to US Congress. Tex Med. 1994;90:20–22.
Oshel RE, Croft T, Rodak J Jr. The National Practitioner Data Bank: the first 4
years. Public Health Rep. 1995;110:383– 394.
Pallesen KS. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: National
Practitioner Data Bank. Nebr Med J. 1991;76:353–372.
Pugsley SC. Implementing the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
Leg Med. 1990:217–242.
Rifkin AM, Evans GE, Hall GD. Antitrust’s recent attack on the peer review
practitioner: is the Health Care Quality Improvement Act a viable remedy?
Md
Med J. 1990;39:21– 32.
Ronai SE. Physician deselection by managed care plans: due process guidance
for doctors terminated without cause.
Conn Med. 1997;61:483–486.
Ronai SE, Meng ME. Civil liability of peer review participants: Patrick v. Burget
and the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986.
Conn Med. 1988;52:537–540.
Sandrick K. Two years and running: the National Practitioner Data Bank begins
to roll, but issues remain. Hospitals. 1993;67:44–45.
Scott C. Should physicians have a voice in insurer settlements of medical
malpractice claims? J Fla Med Assoc. 1993;80:633–666.
Segall SE, Pearl W. Should due process be part of hospital peer review?
South Med J. 1993;86:368–369.
Setness PA. What do you know about the NPDB?
Postgrad Med.
1996;100:15–16, 21–22.
Sfikas PM. Peer review and antitrust.
J Am Dent Assoc. 1997;128:496–498.
Sheets V. Why disciplinary databanks? Why the National Practitioner Data Bank
(NPDB)? Issues. 1996;17:10–11.
Smart CM III. The peer review privilege: what documents are protected from
discovery in litigation. Mo Med. 1998;95:205–206.
Smith MA, Atherly AJ, Kane RL, Pacala JT. Peer review of the quality of care:
reliability and sources of variability for outcome and process assessments.
JAMA. 1997;278: 1573–1578.
Snelson E. Quality assurance implications of federal peer review laws: the
Health Care Quality Improvement Act and the National Practitioner Data Bank.
Qual Assur Util Rev. 1992;7:2–11.
Snelson EA. Peer review, hearing requirements, and antitrust: maximizing
federal Health Care Quality Improvement Act compliance and immunity.
J Med
Assoc Ga. 1992;81:495– 497.
Snelson EA. Physicians under surveillance: the National Practitioner Data Bank.
Minn Med. 1993;76:31–33.
Stern DF. Handling clinical incidents. Nurs Manage. 1997;28:48B–48C, 48G–48H.
Todd JS. National Practitioner Data Bank: just numbers or knowledge?
Public
Health Rep. 1995;110:377–378.
Wolfe SM. Congress should open the National Practitioner Data Bank to all.
Public Health Rep. 1995;110:378–379.
Wolfe SM. Questionable doctors—lots of them!
Revolution. 1996;6:20–22, 85.
Wyden R. Transparency: a prescription against malpractice.
Public Health Rep.
1995;110:380–381.
Yessian MR. Putting the controversy aside, how is the Data Bank doing?
Public
Health Rep. 1995;110:381–382.
