Occupational medicine is one of the three subspecialties certified by the Board
of Preventive Medicine. It is a subspecialty of preventive medicine because
occupational medicine physicians must practice primary prevention, evaluating
the short-term and long-term hazards of the workplace as they relate to
people and disease. In the 40- year history of the board, only a few thousand
physicians have become board certified in occupational medicine. This
certification assumes competence in general medicine and minor emergency
care, toxicology, environmental medicine (heat, physical stress, etc.),
ergonomics, and job fitness evaluations.
In general, it is ethically questionable for physicians to offer services they are
not properly qualified to perform. Occupational medicine poses a particular
problem because the employee usually has no right to refuse the physician’s
services or seek alternative care. There is a special duty to protect patients
who are in coercive environments. Employees are peculiarly dependent on the
occupational medicine physician’s expertise for protection them from workplace
hazards. It is anticipated that occupational medicine physicians will seek
information about hazards, even if that information involves a trade secret.
Independent contractor physicians with limited access to the workplace and no
detailed knowledge of workplace environment cannot effectively protect their
employee patients from hazards and toxic exposures.
In several specific situations, state or federal regulations mandate special
training or certification for physicians performing a regulated activity. The most
widely known are the Department of Transportation regulations on who may
do physical examinations of licensed pilots. Only a Federal Aviation
Administration–approved flight surgeon is allow to perform these exams. Yet
even simple activities such as reading routine X rays of industrial employees
may require a special certification. Physicians who read chest X rays on
workers exposed to asbestos must be certified for the readings to satisfy OSHA
surveillance requirements. In some instances, the OSHA regulations require
occupational medicine physicians to refer workers to specialists. If the white
blood cell count on a benzene-exposed worker falls below a certain level, the
occupational medicine physician must refer the patient to a hematologist for
further evaluation.
Despite the special nature of occupational medicine practice, most ambulatory
care centers, minor emergency clinics, and group practices hold themselves out
as offering occupational medicine services. Until recently this meant
preemployment physical examinations and treatment for acute workplace
injuries. Increasingly, however, these entities are contracting with employers
to provide services that are expected to be professionally comparable to in-
house occupational medical services provided by experienced occupational
medicine professionals. These contracts subject such providers to the full
panoply of state and federal regulations.
Outside occupational medicine providers are handicapped by their isolation
from the workplace. They are generally limited to second- hand, fragmented
information about working conditions and workplace exposures, yet
determining job fitness requires detailed information about both the job and
the workplace. If they also provide the employee’s general medical care, they
are faced with significant questions about the segregation of job-related and
personal medical information. Moreover, the checks and balances inherent in
having general medical care rendered by a physician who is independent of the
company are lost in these hybrid practices. This raises ethical issues when the
physician is asked to determine whether an injury, such as a heart attack, is
work related, triggering workers’ compensation coverage, or not work related,
perhaps denying the employee compensation but reducing costs for the
employer. These conflicts are greatly exacerbated when the employee lacks
insurance for general health problems.
Outside occupational medicine providers are subject to medical malpractice
litigation for the services they provide to employees. Whereas corporate
employee physicians may also be sued for malpractice under the dual-capacity
doctrine, employers usually indemnify their physicians for any losses that result
from actions within the course and scope of their employment. (The dual
capacity doctrine allows employees to sue fellow employees with independent
professional licenses, on the theory that the company does not control a
licensed professional.) Unless contractually indemnified by the employer,
physicians are also liable for the cost of complying with state and regulatory
agency actions. Such actions can be very expensive in terms of legal costs and
lost time for the providers involved. Unlike lawsuits that allege medical
negligence, these costs will not be paid by the physician’s malpractice insurer.
In contrast, if the occupational medicine provider is an employee of the
company, these actions will be brought against the employer rather than the
physician. Even if the physician is individually joined, the company will remain
liable for the incurred costs. Physicians who contract with employers to deliver
occupational medical services must ensure that their contracts require the
employer to pay for the costs of agency enforcement actions that arise from
treating its employees. Private physicians without special training or
experience in occupational medicine should consult an attorney about their
allowable scope of practice and legal obligations before agreeing to provide
occupational medical services.