Fertility Treatment
Ahuja KK, Mamiso J, Emmerson G, Bowen-Simpkins P, Seaton A, Simons EG. Pregnancy following intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment with dead husband’s spermatozoa: ethical and policy considerations. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1360–1363.
Annas GJ. The shadowlands—secrets, lies, and assisted reproduction. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:935–939.
Appleton T. Ethical issues in assisted reproductive medicine: a pragmatic approach. Br J Urol. 1995;76(suppl 2):85–92.
Baird P. Proceed with care: new reproductive technologies and the need for boundaries. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995;12:491–498.
Baird PA. Ethical issues of fertility and reproduction. Annu Rev Med. 1996;47:107–116.
Benshushan A, Schenker JG. The right to an heir in the era of assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1407–1410.
Brahams D. Ethics and the law: the law and assisted human conception. Br Med Bull. 1990;46:850–859.
Braverman AM, English ME. Creating brave new families with advanced reproductive technologies. NAACOGS Clin Issu Perinat Womens Health Nurs. 1992;3:353–363.
Bromham DR, Lilford RJ. Autonomy and its limitations in artificial reproduction. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;5:529–550.
Craft I. Assisted conception. Med Leg J. 1990;58(pt 1):7–15; discussion 15–7.
Daniels K. The controversy regarding privacy versus disclosure among patients using donor gametes in assisted reproductive technology. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997;14:373– 375.
Davis DS. Legal trends in bioethics. J Clin Ethics. 1997;8:204–207.
Dawson K, Singer P. Should fertile people have access to in vitro fertilisation? BMJ. 1990;300:167–170.
Ethics Committee of the American Fertility Society. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 1990;53:1S–104S.
Garcia SA. Reproductive technology for procreation, experimentation, and profit: protecting rights and setting limits. J Leg Med. 1990;11:1–57.
Garcia SA. Sociocultural and legal implications of creating and sustaining life through biomedical technology. J Leg Med. 1996;17:469–525.
Gazvani MR, Wood SJ, Kingsland CR. Assisted conception: current techniques and outcome. Br J Hosp Med. 1997;58:268–271.
Harvey JC. Ethical issues and controversies in assisted reproductive technologies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1992;4:750–755.
ISLAT (Institute for Science Law, and Technology) Working Group. Art into science: regulation of fertility techniques. Science. 1998;281:651–652.
Johnson MH. Genetics, the free market and reproductive medicine. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:408–410.
Jones HW Jr. Assisted reproduction. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1992;35:749–757.
Keifer WS. Preparing for obstetrics in the twenty-first century: Quo Vadis? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168:1787–1790.
Kim MH. Current trends in human IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. Yonsei Med J. 1990;31:91–97.
Kopfensteiner TR. Ethical aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Biomed Pharmacother. 1998;52:204– 207.
Lowy FH, Paterson MA, De Martis F, Klotzko AJ, Friedl B. Immortality through the fertility clinic. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1995;4:375–386.
Lupton ML. Artificial reproduction and the family of the future. Med Law. 1998;17:93–111.
Macnaughton M. Ethics and reproduction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162:879–882.
Marshall BM. Ethical issues in assisted reproduction. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1992;21:582–588.
Maun AR, Williams RS, Graber B, Myers WG. The passage of Florida’s Statute on Assisted Reproductive Technology. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84:889–893.
Meirow D, Schenker JG. The current status of sperm donation in assisted reproduction technology: ethical and legal considerations. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997;14:133–138.
Meniru GI, Craft I. In vitro fertilization and embryo cryopreservation prior to hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997;56:69–70.
Robertson JA. Ethical and legal issues in human embryo donation. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:885–894.
Robertson JA. Innovations in infertility treatment and the rush to market. Womens Health Issues. 1997;7:162–166.
Rothman BK. Ideology and technology: the social context of procreative technology. Mt Sinai J Med. 1998;65:201– 209; discussion 215–223.
Schenker JG. Religious views regarding treatment of infertility by assisted reproductive technologies. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1992;9:3–8.
Shenfield E. Privacy versus disclosure in gamete donation: a clash of interest, of duties, or an exercise in responsibility? J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997;14:371–373.
Shenfield F. Filiation is assisted reproduction: potential conflicts and legal implications. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:1348– 1354.
Shenfield F, Steele SJ. A gift is a gift is a gift, or why gamete donors should not be paid. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:253– 255.
Tyson JE. Moral and ethical issues in reproductive medicine: a crisis of conscience. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1990;2:869–876.
Veeck LL. Frozen preimplantation embryos: parental responsibility versus laboratory liability. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1121–1124.
Wallach EE. Medicolegal and ethical problems of assisted conception. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1990;2:726–731.
Weil E. Privacy and disclosure: the psychological impact on gamete donors and recipients in assisted reproduction. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997;14:369–371.
Wendland CL, Burn F, Hill C. Donor insemination: a comparison of lesbian couples, heterosexual couples and single women. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:764–770.
Yoon M. The Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act: does it protect the best interests of the child in a surrogate arrangement? Am J Law Med. 1990;16:525–553.