Given the broad sweep of federal legislation and the activities of 50 state
legislatures, it is inevitable that there will be conflicts between state and
federal law. If there is a conflict, the Constitution provides that federal law
preempts the conflicting state law unless it is an area specifically reserved to
the states. These conflicts arise in two ways: explicit or implicit preemption.
Explicit preemption occurs when Congress passes a law that explicitly reserves
a given area of legislation to the federal government. There are several
important areas of explicit federal preemption in medical care. One example is
the federal law that specifies the necessary labeling for medical devices and
limits what additional requirements a state may impose without FDA
permission. When Massachusetts passed a law requiring more information on
hearing aid labels, a federal court barred enforcement of the law. Perhaps the
most controversial is the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA),
which preempts state regulation of many types of employer- provided health
insurance plans.
Federal law implicitly preempts a state’s right to regulate if the federal
government so completely controls the area that there is no room for state
regulation. Federal regulation of television and radio, both intrinsically
interstate activities because of the potential for their signals to cross state
lines, leaves no room for state laws governing electronic communications. The
FDA regulations on the approval, manufacture, labeling, and promotion of
prescription drugs are so comprehensive as to leave little room for state
regulation.
In some cases, federal law also preempts private lawsuits brought under state
law. The Cigarette Labeling Act provided that states cannot require more or
different health warnings on a cigarette package than those required by
federal law. The Supreme Court found that this preempted state court lawsuits
by smokers who claimed that the cigarettes were defective because the
packages did not carry adequate warnings (the tobacco litigation has been
based on fraudulently concealing the risks of smoking). Federal law also
preempts certain lawsuits alleging
vaccine- related injuries and substitutes an
administrative compensation fund for possible state tort recoveries.