Climate Change Project

Table of Contents



previous next Up Title Contents


The second step in reviewing medical records is to analyze the content of the records. The question that the review committee must be able to answer is whether the physician's orders and progress notes were an appropriate response to the patient's condition. In this type of retrospective analysis, the patient's condition must be ascertained from the nursing notes, consultants' reports, and laboratory results. To do this effectively, all entries from the different sections of the chart must be correlated through time.

The most effective way to do this is to perform a Timeline analysis of the chart (see Exhibit 6-1). The Timeline chart is particularly effective because it allows nonphysician personnel, such as medical records administrators, to reduce the chart to a form that may be quickly but effectively reviewed by the medical staff review committee. Because of the effort involved, it is unreasonable to perform an analysis of the content of medical records on a routine basis. This type of review should be conducted under a sampling protocol, or in response to specific complications or injuries detected by the review committees.

previous next Up Title Contents

The Climate Change and Public Health Law Site
The Best on the WWW Since 1995!
Copyright as to non-public domain materials
See DR-KATE.COM for home hurricane and disaster preparation
See WWW.EPR-ART.COM for photography of southern Louisiana and Hurricane Katrina
Professor Edward P. Richards, III, JD, MPH - Webmaster

Provide Website Feedback - https://www.lsu.edu/feedback
Privacy Statement - https://www.lsu.edu/privacy
Accessibility Statement - https://www.lsu.edu/accessibility