A key issue in ERISA law is the extent that federal law can preempt state tort laws.
One of the most important legal issues in public health law is the preemption of state public health and safety regulations by federal law. Also see Medical Device Law
See also Tobacco Cases, which all involve federal preemption under the Tobacco Labeling Act.
5th Circuit Reaffirms MDA Preemption - Martin v. Medtronic, Inc., 254 F.3d 573 (5th Cir. 2001)
Washington State Port Regulations Preempted by Federal law - U.S. v. Locke, 120 S.Ct. 1135, 146 L.Ed.2d 69, 68 USLW 4184 (2000)
Brief - Does PMA approval trigger federal preemption of state lawsuits against a medical device supplier? - Haidak v. Collagen Corp., 67 F.Supp.2d 21 (D.Mass. 1999) and Weiland v. Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc., 721 N.E.2d 1149 (Ill. 1999)
Supreme Court Finds Medical Device Amendments do not Preempt State Tort Law - Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996)
5th Circuit First Finds MDA Preemption - Stamps v. Collagen Corp., 984 F.2d 1416 (5th Cir. 1993)
The Medical and Public
Health Law Site
The Best on the WWW Since 1995!
Copyright as to non-public domain materials
See DR-KATE.COM for home disaster preparation
Edward P. Richards, III, JD, MPH
Webmaster