Defendant was stopped as part of a temporary roadblock set up by the police to deter narcotics trafficking. Defendant was driving with a suspended license and the police officer believed he smelled marijuana in the car. Defendant was arrested for the traffic violation and the car was searched with a drug sniffing dog. Cigar ends containing marijuana were found and defendant was charged with possession. Defendant moved to suppress the evidence and the motion for suppression was approved by the trial judge. The state appealed. The Massachusetts Supreme Court upheld the suppression, finding that there was not a direct relationship between driving and the harm to be prevented, i.e., drug dealing. The court explained that traffic roadblocks for drunks are constitutional because the threat to the public health is immediate and is related to driving. The court endorses the United States Supreme Court's three part balancing test from Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 (1979) to determine whether a give public health and safety measure will be constituently.
The Climate Change and Public Health Law Site
The Best on the WWW Since 1995!
Copyright as to non-public domain materials
See DR-KATE.COM for home hurricane and disaster preparation
See WWW.EPR-ART.COM for photography of southern Louisiana and Hurricane Katrina
Professor Edward P. Richards, III, JD, MPH - Webmaster
Provide Website Feedback - https://www.lsu.edu/feedback
Privacy Statement - https://www.lsu.edu/privacy
Accessibility Statement - https://www.lsu.edu/accessibility