Home |
Climate Change Project |
Table of Contents |
Courses | Search |
Your verdict must be for plaintiff if you believe:
First, plaintiff was {here describe facts which entitled plaintiff to possession-e.g.-"the owner of the watch", "the lessee of the automobile"}, and
Second, defendant took possession of {here describe the property} with the intent to exercise some control over {here describe the property}, and
Third, defendant thereby deprived plaintiff of the right to possession of {here describe the property}.
{unless you believe that plaintiff is not entitled to recover by reason of Instruction No. {here insert number of affirmative defense instruction}}.
Your verdict must be for plaintiff if you believe:
First, plaintiff was {here describe facts which entitled plaintiff to possession-e.g.-"the owner of the watch", "the lessee of the automobile"}, and
Second, defendant had possession of {here describe the property}, and
Third, plaintiff made a demand to defendant for possession of {here describe the property}, and
Fourth, thereafter defendant intentionally failed to return possession of {here describe the property} to plaintiff.
{unless you believe that plaintiff is not entitled to recover by reason of Instruction No. {here insert number of affirmative defense instruction}}.
The Climate Change and Public Health Law Site
The Best on the WWW Since 1995!
Copyright as to non-public domain materials
See DR-KATE.COM for home hurricane and disaster preparation
See WWW.EPR-ART.COM for photography of southern Louisiana and Hurricane Katrina
Professor Edward P. Richards, III, JD, MPH - Webmaster
Provide Website Feedback - https://www.lsu.edu/feedback
Privacy Statement - https://www.lsu.edu/privacy
Accessibility Statement - https://www.lsu.edu/accessibility