Home |
Climate Change Project |
Table of Contents |
Courses | Search |
What is the procedural history?
What are the facts and why did plaintiff suffer the emotional injury?
Is the only possible claim for recovery?
What is the impact rule and how was it modifed by Bass v. Nooney?
What are the elements of recovery under Bass?
How are the Bass facts different from this case?
What Restatement section does Bass track?
Why is Bass not good precedent for this case?
Why was the court willing to abandon the impact rule in Bass?
What is the Dillon Standard?
What were some of the variants of Dillon?
What did the Ca court say in Thing v. La Chusa?
What is the Thing v. La Chusa, Standard?
What is the zone of danger standard?
How does it differ from Dillon?
Why is the zone of danger preferable to an eyewitness standard?
What is the Mo standard for negligent infliction of emotional distress?
Why does plaintiff's claim fail under this test?
What are the facts the dissent presents about Martinez v. Long Island Jewish Hillside Medical Center?
How did the NY court analyze that case?
How would you distinguish it from this case so it is consistent with the majority opinion?
What happened in the worker's comp case the dissent quotes?
How might that case be distinguished?
The Climate Change and Public Health Law Site
The Best on the WWW Since 1995!
Copyright as to non-public domain materials
See DR-KATE.COM for home hurricane and disaster preparation
See WWW.EPR-ART.COM for photography of southern Louisiana and Hurricane Katrina
Professor Edward P. Richards, III, JD, MPH - Webmaster
Provide Website Feedback - https://www.lsu.edu/feedback
Privacy Statement - https://www.lsu.edu/privacy
Accessibility Statement - https://www.lsu.edu/accessibility