Home

Climate Change Project

Table of Contents

Courses

Search
<< >> Up Title Contents

Articles

American Medical Association: Collective Negotiation and Antitrust. 1991.

Bell J: Does peer review work? JAMA 1988 Dec 2; 260(21):3213.

Borenstein DB: Standards of proof for ethics committees of professional organizations. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1987 Jul; 38(7):711-12, 717.

Burda D: Public gains access to peer review data. Hospitals 1987 Jan 20; 61(2):57.

Caplan RA; Posner K; Ward RJ; Cheney FW: Peer reviewer agreement for major anesthetic mishaps. QRB 1988 Dec; 14(12):363-68.

Chambers LW; Sibley JC; Spitzer WO; Tugwell P: Quality of care assessment: How to set up and use an indicator condition. Clin Invest Med 1981; 4(1):41-50.

Colin N: Clinical trial stirs legal battles: Legal disputes in Atlanta and Chicago over surgery for myopia raise issue of how controversial surgical techniques should be assessed. Science 1985 Mar 15; 227:1316.

Curran WJ: Medical peer review of physician competence and performance: Legal immunity and the antitrust laws. N Engl J Med 1987 Mar 5; 316(10):597-98.

Dolin LC: Antitrust law versus peer review. N Engl J Med 1985 Oct 31; 313(18):1156-57.

Freidheim JE: Doing something about "bad doctors." IMJ 1986 May; 169(5):257.

Gibbs CE; Cheetham PS: Voluntary review of obstetric and gynecologic services. QRB 1988 Sep; 14(9):290-93.

Grol R; van Eijk J; Mesker P; Schellevis F: Audit: A project on peer review in general practice. Fam Pract 1985 Dec; 2(4):219-24.

Hastings DA: Legal issues raised by private review activities of medical peer-review organizations. J Health Polit Policy Law 1983 Summer; 8(2):293-313.

Koska MT: ACOG program eases peer review conflicts. Hospitals 1988 Apr 20; 62(8):58.

Koska MT: Proper procedures are key to peer review legality experts say. Hospitals 1988 Jun 20; 62(12)65.

LaCombe MA: Peer review (Part 1). Am J Med 1987 Aug; 83(2):336-37.

Logan WS: The evaluation of the impaired physician. New Dir Ment Health Serv 1989 Spring; 41:33-53.

Merry MD: A physician's perspective on proper design of quality assessment criteria. QRB 1982 Oct; 8(10):3-4.

Newald J: Watchful eyes to follow physicians through '87. Hospitals 1987 Jan 5; 61(1):49.

Pattee JJ: Utilization review committee as a peer review mechanism. J Am Geriatr Soc 1980 Apr; 28(4):190-91.

Prout DM: Checks and balances in peer review: Advice from the Patrick case (editorial). Ann Intern Med 1988 Nov 1; 109(9):689-90.

Relman AS; Angell M: How good is peer review? (editorial; comment). N Engl J Med 1989 Sep 21; 321(12):827-29.

Rennie D; Knoll E: Investigating peer review (editorial). Ann Intern Med 1988 Aug 1; 109(3):181.

Riffer J: Antitrust law and peer review remain at odds. Hospitals 1986 Feb 5; 60(3):58.

Riffer J: Peer review gets a big legal push. Hospitals 1986 Nov 20; 60(22):78.

Todd JS: Physicians looking at themselves (editorial). JAMA 1989 Sep 8; 262(10):1376-77.

Winickoff RN; Coltin KL; Morgan MM; Buxbaum RC; Barnett GO: Improving physician performance through peer comparison feedback. Med Care 1984 Jun; 22(6):527-34.

<< >> Up Title Contents

Law and the Physician Homepage
Copyright 1993 - NOT UPDATED

The Climate Change and Public Health Law Site
The Best on the WWW Since 1995!
Copyright as to non-public domain materials
See DR-KATE.COM for home hurricane and disaster preparation
See WWW.EPR-ART.COM for photography of southern Louisiana and Hurricane Katrina
Professor Edward P. Richards, III, JD, MPH - Webmaster

Provide Website Feedback - https://www.lsu.edu/feedback
Privacy Statement - https://www.lsu.edu/privacy
Accessibility Statement - https://www.lsu.edu/accessibility