Climate Change Project

Table of Contents



<< >> Up Title Contents

Informed Consent

When obtaining informed consent, the physician is expected to present an unbiased view of the proposed treatment, presenting the risks as well as the benefits. While this informed consent is important, the most important decision is which treatments to recommend. If the physician's impartiality in the selection of treatments is compromised, then providing the patient with information about the compromised choice is meaningless. This problem is most extreme in the managed care plans that request the physician not to inform the patient about alternative treatments or tests. This benefits the plan by preventing patient complaints about being denied alternative treatments. It completely defeats informed consent, however, and leaves the physician in an indefensible posture if the patient is injured.

<< >> Up Title Contents

Law and the Physician Homepage
Copyright 1993 - NOT UPDATED

The Climate Change and Public Health Law Site
The Best on the WWW Since 1995!
Copyright as to non-public domain materials
See DR-KATE.COM for home hurricane and disaster preparation
See WWW.EPR-ART.COM for photography of southern Louisiana and Hurricane Katrina
Professor Edward P. Richards, III, JD, MPH - Webmaster

Provide Website Feedback - https://www.lsu.edu/feedback
Privacy Statement - https://www.lsu.edu/privacy
Accessibility Statement - https://www.lsu.edu/accessibility