THE JURISPRUDENCE OF PREVENTION: THE RIGHT OF SOCIETAL SELF-DEFENSE

Edward P. Richards, The Jurisprudence Of Prevention: The Right Of Societal Self-Defense Against Dangerous Persons, 16 Hast Const L Q 320 (1989)^a1 (PDF for printing)

Introduction
I. Public Health Jurisprudence

A. The Historical Perspective
*338 B. Hallmarks of Traditional and Modern Public Health Cases

1. Distinguishing Public Health Restrictions from Punishment
2. Expert Decision-makers
3. Review of Public Health Orders
4. Standard of Proof

II. The Jurisprudence of Prevention

A. The Background of the Prevention Decisions

1. In re Gault
2. In re Winship

1. Addington v. Texas
2. Bell v. Wolfish
3. Barefoot v. Estelle
4. Schall v. Martin
5. Allen v. Illinois
6. Hilton v. Braunskill
7. United States v. Salerno

III. Reconciling Traditional Public Health Jurisprudence and the Jurisprudence of Prevention

A. The Punishment-Oriented Prevention Model
B. A Risk Analysis Basis for the Jurisprudence of Prevention

The Climate Change and Public Health Law Site
The Best on the WWW Since 1995!
Copyright as to non-public domain materials
See DR-KATE.COM for home hurricane and disaster preparation
See WWW.EPR-ART.COM for photography of southern Louisiana and Hurricane Katrina
Professor Edward P. Richards, III, JD, MPH - Webmaster

Provide Website Feedback - https://www.lsu.edu/feedback
Privacy Statement - https://www.lsu.edu/privacy
Accessibility Statement - https://www.lsu.edu/accessibility

Home

Climate Change Project

Table of Contents

Courses

Search

Public Health Law Articles

Edward P. Richards, The Jurisprudence Of Prevention: The Right Of Societal Self-Defense Against Dangerous Persons, 16 Hast Const L Q 320 (1989)^a1 (PDF for printing)

Introduction
I. Public Health Jurisprudence

A. The Historical Perspective
*338 B. Hallmarks of Traditional and Modern Public Health Cases

1. Distinguishing Public Health Restrictions from Punishment
2. Expert Decision-makers
3. Review of Public Health Orders
4. Standard of Proof

II. The Jurisprudence of Prevention

A. The Background of the Prevention Decisions

1. In re Gault
2. In re Winship

*352 B. The Prevention Cases

1. Addington v. Texas
2. Bell v. Wolfish
3. Barefoot v. Estelle
4. Schall v. Martin
5. Allen v. Illinois
6. Hilton v. Braunskill
7. United States v. Salerno

III. Reconciling Traditional Public Health Jurisprudence and the Jurisprudence of Prevention

A. The Punishment-Oriented Prevention Model
B. A Risk Analysis Basis for the Jurisprudence of Prevention

Conclusions

Edward P. Richards, The Jurisprudence Of Prevention: The Right Of Societal Self-Defense Against Dangerous Persons, 16 Hast Const L Q 320 (1989)a1 (PDF for printing)

Introduction I. Public Health Jurisprudence

II. The Jurisprudence of Prevention

Edward P. Richards, The Jurisprudence Of Prevention: The Right Of Societal Self-Defense Against Dangerous Persons, 16 Hast Const L Q 320 (1989)^a1 (PDF for printing)

Introduction
I. Public Health Jurisprudence