The hearsay rule holds that one person cannot testify about the truth of
what another person said. Witnesses can testify only as to what they heard the
person in question say. For example, a nurse may testify that she heard Dr.
Jones say, "I must have been drunk to have nicked that patient's intestine!"
The jury could accept this as evidence of what Dr. Jones said but not as
evidence that she was drunk or had nicked the intestine. These facts would need
to be proved through the testimony of Dr. Jones herself or the testimony of
appropriate expert witnesses.
The hearsay rule arises from the need for counsel to cross-examine every
witness and document to determine its truthfulness. If a statement made out of
court is accepted as evidence, the person making that statement cannot be
questioned (cross-examined) about the truthfulness of it. The court demands
that the person who actually made the statement be brought into the courtroom,
placed under oath, and asked to repeat the statement.
If this rule were applied to the medical record, everyone who made an entry in
the record would have to be called into the courtroom and asked which entries
they made, why they made them, and what information they based these entries
upon--an extremely time-consuming process and maybe even impossible. Because of
these practical difficulties, the courts have created the business records
exception to the hearsay rule: documents may be admitted into evidence without
the requirement that the persons who made the entries be available for
cross-examination.
The Medical and Public
Health Law Site
The Best on the WWW Since 1995!
Copyright as to non-public domain materials
See DR-KATE.COM for home disaster preparation
Edward P. Richards, III, JD, MPH Webmaster
